I was doing a quick channel scan to try and catch the latest on the fighting between Russia and Georgia.  I ran across CNN and T.J. Holmes was doing a live interview with Georgian President  Mikheil Saakashvili.  While watching this 'inteview', T.J. Holmes mannerisms, rebuttles, rebukes, tone, inflections, body, face, and hand gestures were nothing but condensending and disrepectful towards a 'Head of State'.  It was hardly an interview, and not at all a piece of journalism that should seek to report the unbiased facts. 

   It made the arguement even more clear that CNN is a pro-Socialist entity since it appeared that T.J. Holmes was clearly defending the actions by Russia and it's military.  While independent media sources have not be able to confirm nor deny Georgian claims of indicriminate Russian bombings and killings, the lack of professional journalism by CNN today gives shame to America in general.  CNN is an American corporation and outsiders see CNN as a representative of the People of the United States.  The Georgian people, no doubt, watching this interview, went away with a feeling of betrayal and lack of concern on behalf of America.  Visual impact is a powerful medium often taken for granted.

    

 

                                     What kind of 'change' does the DNC really need to save itself???

Okay, real World happening now situation.  Both candidates have given their official immediate responses to the crisis developing between Russia and Georgia.  Reading both statements who do you think shows that he knows what is going on, who the players are in World politics, and is the best response?

 

    John McCain:  
"The news reports indicate that the Russian military forces crossed an internationally recognized border into the sovereign territory of Georgia. Russia should immediately and unconditionally cease its military operations and withdraw all forces from sovereign Georgian territory. What is most critical now is to avoid further confrontation between Russian and Georgian military forces. The consequences of Euro-Atlantic stability and security are grave. The government of Georgia has called for a cease fire and for resumption of direct talks on South Ossetia with international mediators. The U.S. should immediately convene an emergency session of the United Nations Security Council to call on Russia to reverse course.

 

   Barak Obama:

I strongly condemn the outbreak of violence in Georgia, and urge an immediate end to armed conflict. Now is the time for Georgia and Russia to show restraint, and to avoid an escalation to full scale war.  Georgia’s territorial integrity must be respected. All sides should enter into direct talks on behalf of stability in Georgia, and the United States, the United Nations Security Council, and the international community should fully support a peaceful resolution to this crisis.

 

   Both of these statements come directly from each of their Official websites.  Who do you think the Russians would take seriously????

    DNC...do you want to guarantee a win in '08???  When Barak gave his speech in '04 at the Demcratic National Convention, it was an eye catching moment.  Obama caught the eye of many of the DNC, the Media, and most everyone else, because, it was, a good speech in his delivery of it.  So, the powers that be in the DNC started saying, this guy must be someone that can be a rising star in the DNC. 

   As we watched, they in the MSM (Media) and in circles of the DNC, became star-struck with Barak.  It was liking watching a major motion picture with known actors and this actor had scene stealers that put him in the spotlight and not the main actors.  I"m sure the Hollywood people can relate.  So, without having this new 'star' do a few more roles as the number 2 or 3 after the lead...he, Barak, was put into a major motion picture as the lead actor. 

   Just like many movies....his acting and the story just didn't catch on at the 'box-office'.  So now, the powers that be, are scratching their collective heads....we should have gone with a known and proven 'lead' person.  i.e. Hillary. 

   It's crunch time DNC.  The fourth quarter is starting, the opposing team has revitalized themselves and are playing hard and making touchdowns.  Oh, and this is the Super Bowl. 

   So DNC, ask yourselves, do you continue to back the 'presumptive' nominee and live off of 'hope' for a win, or do you take a known proven team member....and ensure a win.????  The Convention is weeks away.  Who do you nominate??? 

    Here's a link to the story and the story has quite a few links to 'other' atrocities committed by Mexican 'military' on our soil.  On our soil.

 

  Is the United States a bunch of fracken cowards or what??!!  Not only are there over 12 million illegal persons in our Country, elements of the Mexican Military have routinely escorted drug and human smugglers to/from the Mexcian/US border.  And our political 'leaders in Washington D.C. just turn a blind eye to the pain and suffereing of Americans at the hands of Mexican bandits. 

   At least Texas excecuted that waste of human flesh murderer/rapist. 

   This issue alone, stands out as a main reason to call for a totally new political party in the United States.  A strong party that will stand and act, of and for the People of the United States.  Has the Bush's done anything?  No.  Did Clinton do anything? No. Will Obama do anything?  No.  Has Pelosi done anything? No.  So has either the Democrats or Republicans done anything to stop the incursions into our Nation?  Some will say, 'they're building a fence'.   That's a band aid on a amputed arm.  National Guard 'infantry' needs to be put on our borders now.  The U.S. Border Patrol needs Humvees and automatic weapons.  Al Quida, Hizbollah, Hamas, MS13 has come across our border and D.C. says they're taking 'security' seriously??? 

    The time for action has passed.  The time for immediate response is now.  How about it D.C.??????

    I saw a story about Michelle Obama defending her husband, which is understandable and admirable, all spouses should defend their spouse.   Now, the Obama campaign has gone to lengths to try show the World that their campaign isn't about race.  Now, go back a few post of mine dear reader when I observed and wrote, that if Obama goes to the White House, so does his 'staff'.   This same group of people running his campaign.  Now, that being said, I thought that the Obama's themselves were not 'racist'.  And if their staff was on the ball, they would ensure no 'public' perceptions would be allowed to happen that would further this growing 'truth'??, or belief/question more and more are having concerning the Obama's deep inner feelings concerning race.  Then I saw this photo/video clip from an innocent news program:                               "http://abcnews.go.com/GMA/Vote2008/story?id=5529046

---

Obama tells 7-year-old America not so great
Responds haltingly to girl who asked why he wants to be president

---

Posted: August 07, 2008
12:46 pm Eastern

© 2008 WorldNetDaily

    I heard an old timer on a local talk show say the following this morning.  Whenever he gets into a discussion with someone who believes in evolution instead of religion, this old timer remarks with the following:  

 

     "SO THAT MEANS, ALL WE ARE IS A HYBRED RACE OF APES, LIVING ON A ROCK, FLOATING IN SPACE."

 

    I wrote that in caps not to yell, but just to be able to highlight that statement to be able to read easier by you, dear reader. 

....nope, not talking Paris, France.  Though I would like to visit France before Islam takes over, the UK too for that matter.  But two nights ago when Matt Drudge broke the Paris Hilton "Presidential Campaign" video, my wife and I watched it.  My immediate thoughts were, that Paris hit a nice PR home-run for herself, she DID NOT endorse the Obama campaign, and did not quite endorse the McCain campaign, but gave McCain good press. 

    Watching and hearing the talking heads on TV and radio the past few days, most missed that mark by far and began actually attacking Paris wrongly I felt. 

    Paris did have an actual energy plan, which would be viable for all sides to be Bipartisan to agree upon.  Something we haven't heard from our 'elected' Officials in D.C.  I give Paris credit on having a plan at least, as is often said, 'out of the mouth of babes'.   Wink wink.

  

   History, again shows us,  and the leftist liberal socialist, that our Fore Fathers have always had God in their minds and hearts when they drafted up the Constitution of the United States and each seperate State's Constitution. 

    
...be sure to read the message at the bottom!
Alabama 1901, Preamble We the people of the State of Alabama, Invoking the favor and guidance of Almighty God, do ordain and establish the following Constitution.
Alaska 1956, Preamble We, the people of Alaska, Grateful to God and to those who founded our nation and pioneered this great land.
Arizona 1911, Preamble We, the people of the State of Arizona, Grateful to Almighty God for our liberties, do ordain this Constitution...
Arkansas 1874, Preamble We, the people of the State of Arkansas, Grateful to Almighty God for the privilege of choosing our own form of government...
California 1879, Preamble We, the People of the State of California, Grateful to Almighty God for our freedom...
Colorado 1876, Preamble We, the people of Colorado, With profound reverence for the Supreme Ruler of Universe...
Connecticut 1818, Preamble. The People of Connecticut, acknowledging with gratitude the good Providence of God in permitting them to enjoy.
Delaware 1897, Preamble Through Divine Goodness all men have, by nature, the rights of worshipping and serving their Creator according to the dictates of their consciences.
Florida 1885, Preamble We, the people of the State of Florida, grateful to Almighty God for our constitutional liberty, establish this Constitution...
Georgia 1777, Preamble We, the people of Georgia, Relying upon protection and guidance of Almighty God, do ordain and establish this Constitution...
Hawaii 1959, Preamble We, the people of Hawaii, Grateful for Divine Guidance ... Establish this Constitution.
Idaho 1889, Preamble We, the people of the State of Idaho, grateful to Almighty God for our freedom, to secure its blessings.
Illinois 1870, Preamble We, the people of the state of Illinois, grateful to Almighty God for the civil, political and religious liberty which He hath so long permitted us to enjoy and looking to Him for a blessing on our endeavors.
Indiana 1851, Preamble We, the People of the State of Indiana, grateful to Almighty God for the free exercise of the right to choose our form of government.
Iowa 1857, Preamble We, the People of the State of Iowa, Grateful to the Supreme Being for the blessings hitherto enjoyed, and feeling our dependence on Him for a continuation of these blessings, establish this Constitution.
Kansas 1859, Preamble We, the people of Kansas, Grateful to Almighty God for our civil and religious privileges establish this Constitution.
Kentucky 1891, Preamble. We, the people of the Commonwealth are grateful to Almighty God for the civil, political and religious liberties...
Louisiana 1921, Preamble We, the people of the State of Louisiana, grateful to Almighty God for the civil, political and religious liberties we enjoy.
Maine 1820, Preamble We the People of Maine acknowledging with grateful hearts the goodness of the Sovereign Ruler of the Universe in affording us an opportunity. And imploring His aid and direction.
Maryland 1776, Preamble We, the people of the state of Maryland, grateful to Almighty God for our civil and religious liberty...
Massachusetts 1780, Preamble We...the people of Massachusetts, acknowledging with grateful hearts, the goodness of the Great Legislator of the Universe In the course of His Providence, an opportunity and devoutly imploring His direction.
Michigan 1908, Preamble le. We, the people of the State of Michigan, Grateful to Almighty God for the blessings of freedom establish this Constitution.
Minnesota, 1857, Preamble We, the people of the State of Minnesota, Grateful to God for our civil and religious liberty, and desiring to perpetuate its blessings:
Mississippi 1890, Preamble We, the people of Mississippi In convention assembled, grateful to Al mighty God, and invoking His blessing on our work.
Missouri 1845, Preamble We, the people of Missouri, With profound reverence for the Supreme Ruler of the Universe, and grateful for His goodness. Establish this Constitution...
Montana 1889, Preamble. We, the people of Montana, grateful to Almighty God for the Blessings of liberty establish this Constitution.
Nebraska 1875, Preamble We, the people, grateful to Almighty God for our freedom. Establish this Constitution.
Nevada 1864, Preamble We the people of the State of Nevada, grateful to Almighty God for our freedom, establish this Constitution...
New Hampshire 1792, Part I. Art. I. Sec. V Every individual has a natural and unalienable right to worship God according to the dictates of his own conscience.
New Jersey 1844, Preamble We, the people of the state of New Jersey, grateful to Almighty God for civil and religious liberty which He hath so long permitted us to enjoy, and looking to Him for a blessing on our endeavors.
New Mexico 1911, Preamble We, the People of New Mexico, grateful to Almighty God for the blessings of liberty.
New York 1846, Preamble We, the people of the State of New York, Grateful to Almighty God for our freedom, in order to secure its blessings.
North Carolina 1868, Preamble We the people of the state of North Carolina, grateful to Almighty God, the Sovereign Ruler of Nations, for our civil, political, and religious liberties, and acknowledging our dependence upon Him for the continuance of those...
North Dakota 1889, Preamble We, the people of North Dakota, Grateful to Almighty God for the blessings of civil and religious liberty, do ordain...
Ohio 1852, Preamble We the people of the state of Ohio, Grateful to Almighty God for our freedom, to secure its blessings and to promote our common...
Oklahoma 1907, Preamble Invoking the guidance of Almighty God, in order to secure and perpetuate the blessings of liberty, establish this
Oregon 1857, Bill of Rights, Article I Section 2. All men shall be secure in the Natural right, to worship Almighty God according to the dictates of their consciences
Pennsylvania 1776, Preamble We, the people of Pennsylvania, grateful to Almighty God for the blessings of civil and religious liberty, and humbly invoking His guidance...
Rhode Island 1842, Preamble. We the People of the state of Rhode Island grateful to Almighty God for the civil and religious liberty which He hath so long permitted us to enjoy, and looking to Him for a blessing...
South Carolina, 1778, Preamble We, the people of he State of South Carolina grateful to God for our liberties, do ordain and establish this Constitution.
South Dakota 1889, Preamble We, the people of South Dakota, Grateful to Almighty God for our civil and religious liberties.
Tennessee 1796, Art. XI.III. That all men have a natural and indefeasible right to worship Almighty God according to the dictates of their conscience...
Texas 1845, Preamble We the People of the Republic of Texas, acknowledging, with gratitude, the grace and beneficence of God.
Utah 1896, Preamble Grateful to Almighty God for life and liberty, we establish this Constitution.
Vermont 1777, Preamble Whereas all government ought to enable the individuals who compose it to enjoy their natural rights, and other blessings which the Author of Existence has bestowed on man.
Virginia 1776, Bill of Rights, XVI Religion, or the Duty which we owe our Creator can be directed only by Reason and that it is the mutual duty of all to practice Christian Forbearance, Love and Charity towards each other
Washington 1889, Preamble We the People of the State of Washington, grateful to the Supreme Ruler of the Universe for our liberties, do ordain this Constitution
West Virginia 1872, Preamble Since through Divine Providence we enjoy the blessings of civil, political and religious liberty, we, the people of West Virginia Reaffirm our faith in and constant reliance upon God ...
Wisconsin 1848, Preamble We, the people of Wisconsin, Grateful to Almighty God for our freedom, domestic tranquility...
Wyoming 1890, Preamble We, the people of the State of Wyoming, Grateful to God for our civil, political, and religious liberties, establish this Constitution.


 After reviewing acknowledgments of God from all 50 state constitutions, one is faced with the prospect that maybe, the ACLU and the out-of-control federal courts are wrong!  If you found this to be 'Food for thought' copy and send to as many as you think will be enlightened, as I hope you were.
          Wow.....Barak Obama, the DNC, CAIR, and the ACLU sure have their work cut out for them now in re-writting all those Constitutions to ensure that no 'God' is mentioned, unless the name 'Allah' is specifically used.  

   Okay dear reader, before you have a mental meltdown and scream....WHY????   This is from an email that's going around the 'conservative circles. 

  

    
Reasons I am Voting Democrat-

I'm voting Democratic because an inexperienced US Senator gives great
speeches that make me feel good.

I'm voting Democratic because I believe the government will do a better job
of spending the money I earn than I would.

I'm voting Democratic because I believe oil companies' profits of 4% on a
gallon of gas are obscene but the government taxing the same gallon of gas
at 15% isn't.

I'm voting Democratic because I believe three or four elitist liberals need
to rewrite the Constitution through judicial fiat every few days to suit
some idealists who would otherwise NEVER get their agendas past the voters.

I'm voting Democratic because I don't want a stimulus check to spend. Let
the government spend it for me.

I'm voting Democratic because freedom of speech is fine as long as nobody is
offended by it.

I'm voting Democratic because I believe that business should not be allowed
to make profits for themselves. They need to break even and give the rest
away to the employees (after taxes).

I'm voting Democratic because I'm not concerned about the slaughter of
millions of babies so long as we keep all death row inmates alive.

I'm voting Democratic because I believe that churches should only be allowed
for political speeches.

I'm voting Democratic because I don't want Doctors who were at the top of
their classes to operate on me. I want a government employee who makes $50k
a year and couldn't hack it as a contractor or an engineer doing my surgery.


I'm voting Democratic because I believe that paying $4.00 a gallon or more
is no reason to drill for the mountain of oil we are sitting on in THIS
country. We wouldn't want to have to move a couple of polar bears now would
we?

I'm voting Democratic because when we pull out of Iraq, I trust that the bad
guys will stop what they're doing because they now think we're good people.

I'm voting Democratic because I like it when planes fly into buildings full
of civilians. I want to see more of that.

I'm voting Democratic because I believe that when the terrorists don't have
to hide from us over there, when they come over here I don't want to have
any guns in the house to fight them off with.

I'm voting Democratic because I don't want to eat poison food and drink
infected water. We all know Republicans love that stuff. (Ever wonder why
the most left wing country in the world (China) is the most polluted?)

I'm voting Democratic because I believe that people who can't tell us if it
will rain on Friday CAN tell us that the polar ice caps will melt away in
ten years if I don't start driving a Prius.

I'm voting Democratic because I love the fact that I can now marry whatever
I want. I'm going to marry my TV.

I'm voting Democratic because I REALLY believe there is no bias in the
media.   

     That second to last one really makes sense to me.  I can go to California or Maryland and marry whomever or whatever I want to.  Right?  Seriously,  how can either State legislate that there are rules or boundaries in marriage.  Marriage is defined by them as any two persons desiring to make a life time committment in an institution called 'marriage'.   What defines a 'person'?   Is there such a definition?  How can they argue that there is any kind of set parameters in the definition of a 'person'?   What if I desire to marry more than one 'person', or maybe I desire to marry one person who will in turn marry two others.  That is our marriage right?!!  The 'person' I married has the RIGHTS to marry someone else of same, different, or whatever sex and as many as they wish.  Then likewise, those people can marry someone else.  It's just marriage anyway in the eyes of California and Maryland.  It's no biggie, right?  Everyone can claim benefits from the Government and money to provide whatever services, legal, medical, housing, can be taken from the profits of the oil companies and/or any company that the Governments of California and Maryland identify as 'obscene' profit makers.  What great States those two States are.  I'm voting Democrat, since I know Obama and Pelosi will then make these marriage laws, rule of law across the Nation.

   I just read this little story about Chavez, and his scary historical path of Hitler he takes. 

 

  

Venezuela's Chavez Pushes Through 26 Decrees

Monday, August 4, 2008 11:30 PM

CARACAS, Venezuela -- President Hugo Chavez is aiming to set up neighborhood-based militias, move toward a socialist economy in Venezuela and increase state control over agriculture under a package of laws enacted by presidential decree.

Changes in areas from the military to small business loans were pushed through by the president in 26 laws released Monday in the official gazette. Chavez approved them on the final day of an 18-month period during which lawmakers had granted him special legislative powers.

Critics fumed that Chavez did not consult with major business groups before approving the decrees, and some warned the laws would scare off private investment and further weaken private enterprise.

"We ask the president: Why does he fear democracy?" Fedecamaras business chamber leader Jose Manuel Gonzalez said at a news conference.

Gonzalez said business leaders were busy analyzing the scope of the decrees because they came as a complete surprise. He warned the package of laws included socialist concepts that voters rejected last year as part of Chavez's proposed overhaul of Venezuela's constitution.

"We are sure that this is nothing more than imposing the reform project that was rejected in December," Gonzalez said.

Vice President Ramon Carrizalez denied it, saying "there are things that can be done without the necessity of reforming the constitution."

Under one of the new laws, food retailers or distributors caught skirting government-imposed price controls or hoarding products will be punished with up to six years in prison.

Business owners who refuse to produce, import, transport or sell "items of basic necessity" can face up to 10 years in jail.

The decree allows the government to "restrict or prohibit the import, export, distribution, exchange or sale" of certain foods or agricultural products and "take over distribution activities when considered necessary."

Other measures increase state control over commerce, services and publicity. Businesses that violate the new rules can face fines or indefinite closure.

One decree aims to support efforts toward a socialist-style economy at the community level, providing for bartering of goods and "social property" businesses operated communally.

"The government believes it can advance toward a centralized, state-run economic system, but that's going to cause more conflict with the business community," said Jorge Botti, an economist who heads a Fedecamaras committee studying the impact of government policy on the private sector.

Critics also raised concerns about a decree that creates a new National Bolivarian Militia _ a branch of the military consisting of civilian volunteers who will help neighborhood-based "communal councils" establish "defense committees."

Former defense minister Fernando Ochoa warned that neighborhood defense groups could closely resemble Cuba's Committees for the Defense of the Revolution, which encourage citizens to watch for "counterrevolutionary" activities.

 

     Hitler had his 'Brownshirts' which were mainly 'thugs and criminals' that enforced Hitler's laws.  Like Hitler, Chavez is going to take Venezuela down a historical path of destruction for Venezuela and the Venezulean people, and the neighboring countries as well. 

   Chavez, like his historical brother, Adolf Hitler, used corruption and strong arm tactics to get himself 'elected'.  Then Chavez, like Hitler, changed his 'nation's Constitution' to ensure his power 'legally'.  Then Chavez, like Hitler, began taking over private industry and ensuring that all industry was either controlled by the State or pledged full allegience to the State.  Now Chavez, like Hitler, has been making scape goats out of a certain people, Hilter - the Jews, Chavez - the Americans.  Now Chavez, like Hitler, is making the political rounds in his immediate border area to Nation's that border his to either gain an ally, ensure a diplomatic peace, or figure out who he wants to target next for expansion of his emerging empire. 

    Chavez, like Hitler, is more concerned about expanding his military capibilities than his people's infrastructure and well being. 

   

Caracas, Venezuela (AHN) - At least 24 Russian-made Sukhoi-30 fighter jets were delivered to Venezuela on Sunday as part of the country's defense capability build-up. The purchase came after the Bush administration refused to sell parts for Venezuela's aging F-16 jet fleet.

Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez said of the delivery, "We received the Sukhoi aircraft as well as pilots, crew and missiles, and the aircraft will begin military practice with missiles soon."

He said the purchase of the aircraft from Russia was intended for defense capabilities only.

Chavez in 2006 announced his plan to buy the jets from Russia after the U.S. refused to sell Venezuela spare part for the F-16 fleet of the Venezuelan Air Force.

The Su-30, a multi-role strike fighter that can perform both air superiority and ground attacks, was dubbed by a German defense review magazine as the best combat fighter bomber plane ever built in the world.

Chavez said the purchase of 24 Su-30 is only the beginning as he hopes to buy the more advanced Su-35s from Russia.

    Now, dear reader, did you catch Chavez's obvious rascist remark?   Read this:  "Any gringo ship that sails into brown waters (river waters) will itself turn brown and go to the bottom, because they'll not get through," Chavez said.

 

    Gringo, is a derogatory reference to mainly Caucasion Americans.  The 'G' word is akin to the 'N' word and should always be taken as such. 

    Chavez is salivating for the chance to kill Americans.  Also note dear reader, that those Sukhoi fighter jets , "We received the Sukhoi aircraft as well as pilots, crew and missiles, and the aircraft will begin military practice with missiles soon."   Pilots....Russian pilots.  If Chavez orders those Sukhoi's into action in the next year, Russian pilots will be flying them, not Venezuelan.  It will take that long to teach the Venezulean's to properly fly such an advanced and whole new system of aircraft.  So if you think Putin and Medvedev are any kind of friend to the U.S., you're sadly mistaken.  They too are looking to expand Russian influence and military into the America's.  Bombers to Cuba and fighters to Venezuela.  And Chavez just eager to pull the trigger.

    Maybe the great Obama will just talk to them and all will be fine.  Probably would...they're all 'socialist' at heart.

   That's kind of how the conversation went.  I was making some observations last week during the 'Nightly News' shows, that for well over three weeks, there hasn't been a peep on the MSM news about Hillary Clinton.  It was 40% Obama, 10% McCain, the rest on the World and National news.  And I'm thinking I'm giving McCain a bit much of a percentage too. 

   But seriously...the MSM love for Hillary went...away.  Talk about being jilted.  They were stone cold to Hillary.  So now with Barak Obama 'Superstar' garnering the majority of the media's attention, the shine has begun to wear off the chrome and we're seeing some pretty rusty tin underneath.  Voters, and people in general are now taking a second look at Obama and thinking, wait a minute, what did I buy and buy into??? 

   The Polls are also very telling.  Obama didn't get that magic 50% that the Obamaniacs were expecting.  Senator McCain is slowly gaining ground with him being, just who he has been, himself. 

   I'm thinking that in some of the luxery bars, some of the exclusive Country Club back rooms, penthouses over New York, Las Vegas, Miami, and L.A., and across the fruited planes of this Nation....Democrats are asking themselves.....'maybe we should've back Hillary instead??" 

    Hey Democrats, here's a bit from a Time Magazine story:  Thursday, Januray 25th, 2007:    Hillary Clinton is the clear front-runner to win the Democratic Party's nomination for President in 2008, but the Republican race will be a close contest between Senator John McCain and former New York mayor Rudy Giuliani — with McCain edging Giuliani by a three- to four-point margin. And a presidential face-off between Clinton and McCain, right now, would be close to a dead heat. Those are some of the key findings of a new TIME poll earlier this week that canvassed a random sample of 1,064 registered voters by phone.

 

    Now that was then, this is now, and you DNC-Democrats, have what you asked for: Barak Obama.   You took an unknown and threw him out there onto the World stage.  You gave up on a 'woman' that has the experience in the World and D.C. political systems.  A woman who was loved by many across the World.   A woman who stood by her own words and convictions.  Are you happy today Democrats with your 'choice'?  BHO.  Did you make the correct choice??  Or were blinded by the chrome reflecting Hollywood lights?

 

    Now you have to really ask yourselves Democrats...is it..too late??  Denver is coming.

 

    But, as a conservative, I say, thank you Democrats.  Thank you for choosing an 'unknown', an untested,  a slick talker as long as the tele-prompter is in front of him. 

 

    

 

 

  Barak Obama has flipped faster than hotcakes at IHOP on his stance about oil and drilling.  Most of the talking heads on the radio have addressed this issue very well.  What does this say about Obama, the man?  It says to me, and should to you, that Barak Obama has no convictions that he will stick to, other than Black Liberation Theology since he's 'quit that Church' but hasn't denounced the 'theology'.  It tells me that Barak Obama, has not done his homework, his research, nor has his 'staff'.  The same 'staff' that would surround him duing a World crisis!!!  Think about that as well heading to the polls.....not only will you have an indecisive President, you will have a staff that only thinks on one level.....Hollywoodish popularity.

   Recently, what two weeks ago, Speaker of the House...Nancy Pelosi, declared that President Bush must release oil immediately from the 'Strategic' Reserves to alleviate the prices at the pump.  Then Obama said the same thing just a few days ago, after he flipped from his previous statements that the Strategic Reserve would not be touched. (We can use our tire guages and fill our tires...)

   Let's check the dictionaries:  
STRATEGIC: